the LINC Network

LinC will be holding a two-part workshop and discussion on:

Theme, topic, Subject and Given

In these two sessions we will discuss how the grammatical features of Theme, Subject and Given contribute to the topic of a text - a non-grammatical category.

In the first session (8th November) we will go over textual mark-up of Theme and Subject and discuss different aspects of thematicity and the notion of participant tracking. Those taking part will then be given a text, already marked up for Given/New, and asked to mark up Theme and Subject and to schematise participant tracking in preparation for the second session (22nd November).

The following readings are also recommended as preparation for the second session:

• Berry, M. 1996. What is Theme? – A(nother) personal view. In Berry, M., Butler, C.S., Fawcett, R.P., and Huang, G.W. (eds.) Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Martin, J.R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins - Chapter 3; pp.93-157
• Thompson, G. 2007. Unfolding theme: the development of clausal and textual perspectives on Theme. In Hasan, R., C. Matthiessen and J. Webster Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective (Volume 2). London and Oakville: Equinox.

The second session will be entirely dedicated to a discussion of how the various grammatical and semantic devices analysed co-contribute to what we commonly refer to as the ‘topic’ of a text.

Both sessions (Nov. 8th and 22nd, 2010) will start at 5pm in Room 5.26 of the Humanities Building, Colum Road.

How to win friends and influence people. Or not. Thematic options in letters from politicians

Abstract
The talk will be based on three letters from politicians. These were replies to letters I had written to the politicians. The politicians are all from the same political party. In each case I agreed with some of the opinions expressed, but disagreed with others, so from the point of view of content the letters were equally acceptable/unacceptable to me. However the letters differed greatly in the manner in which the opinions were expressed and this meant that my overall reactions varied from pleased to furious.

I shall begin by inviting members of the seminar to comment on versions of the letters from which I have removed the words expressing the actual opinions. (I don't want us to get distracted by differing political opinions. I want us to focus on the frameworks of the letters which affect the manner of presentation.)

I shall then present a linguistic analysis of the framework sections of the letters in terms of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), focusing particularly on the Themes of clauses. The Theme of a clause in SFL terms is the beginning of the clause - for my present purpose this will mean the part of the clause which comes before the verb. The Theme of the clause is assumed to be the orienting section of the clause where, among other things, the tone is set for what follows and the relationship is established between writer and reader or speaker and hearer.

The Thematic analysis certainly accounts for my own preferences among the letters. I shall be interested to see if it also accounts for those of other members of the seminar.

Date: Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Venue: Room 5.18, Humanities Building, Cardiff University

Time: 4.45pm refreshments for 5.00pm start

Thematic options

We are really delighted to announce that Margaret Berry will be speaking as part of our LinC events and our CLCR seminar series.

How to win friends and influence people. Or not. Thematic options in letters from politicians

Abstract is here

21st April 2010
5.00pm,
Room 5.18
Humanities Building
Cardiff University